Nile Basin Initiative Secretariat

Theme
Ecosystems and biodiversity
Goals
Environment
Programs
Basin-wide Program
Ownerships
NileSEC Document

Files in this item

Authors
Mr. Philip Otieno
Date Of Publication
Accessibility status
Open Access
Language
English (United States)
Type
Technical Report
Abstract

This study seek to build the economic case for wetland conservation and wise use, with a
specific focus on generating evidence on the economic value of wetland as ‘green’ water
infrastructure. By so doing, it intends to bring wetland ecosystem values to the attention of
river basin planners and managers, and to thereby promote better-informed, more effective,
inclusive, equitable and sustainable conservation and development decision-making. It is
also good to appreciate that instrumental economic value obtained from ecosystem services is
only one constituent of the comprehensive value of a wetland environment, and that the
intrinsic value of nature also provides a case for the conservation a wetland ecosystem and its
biodiversity. The main objective of this study is to generate information on economic value
of the Sio-siteko wetland ecosystem services to inform the development of conservation
investment plans
The Sio-Siteko wetland system spans the Kenya-Uganda border. It traverses Busia district in
Uganda and Busia County in Kenya and is part of the wider Sio-Malaba-Malakisi catchment
(World Bank, 2009). In this study, the wetland’s size is regarded to occupy an area of 60 𝑘𝑚2
based on the 2019 Sio-siteko wetland monograph which shows that the wetland size is
slightly under than 60 𝑘𝑚2
. In this study, only sub locations and parishes that border the
wetland in Kenya and Uganda respectively have been considered as the buffer zone with
direct influence on the wetland resource use. These include thirteen parishes (South East,
Central, South West, Nangwe, Buyengo, Buhehe, Bulwenge, Budimo, Lumino, Junge,
Dadira, Bumunji, and Majanji) in Uganda and sixteen sub locations (Busijo, Agenga,
Bujwang’a, Sigalame, Luchululo, Luanda, Buloma, Lugala, Ludacho,Mango, Sibinga,
Nang’oma, Muyafwa, Mundika, Mayenje, and Mjini in Kenya (NBI, 2009). However, in the
household survey, sub locations and parishes in Busia towns of Kenya and Uganda were
excluded since the study mainly focused on production and urban dwellers were viewed as
more likely to be consumers.

Similar Documents

WP2_FV

Enhancement of the Eastern Nile Flood Forecasting and Early Warning (EN-FFEWS) and Flood Risk Mapping: Flood Vulnerability and Flood Risk Assessment Report

Authors
ENTRO_NBI
Date Of Publication
17 Jun 2024
Accessibility status
Open Access
Language
English
Document Types
Technical Report
Type
Technical Report
WP2_FR

Enhancement of the Eastern Nile Flood Forecasting and Early Warning (EN-FFEWS) and Flood Risk Mapping: Enhanced and Improved EN-FEWS Report

Authors
ENTRO_NBI
Date Of Publication
01 Mar 2024
Accessibility status
Open Access
Language
English
Document Types
Technical Report
Type
Technical Report
Image water quality

ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) FOR HYDROMET STATIONS UNDER NILE BASIN INITIATIVE REGIONAL HYDROMET PROJECT

Authors
NBI
Date Of Publication
02 Jan 2023
Accessibility status
Open Access
Language
English
Document Types
Technical Report
Type
Technical Report

Nile Basin Socio-Economic Outlook 2050

Authors
Nile Basin Initiative
Date Of Publication
28 Nov 2022
Accessibility status
Open Access
Language
English
Document Types
Technical Report
Type
Technical Report

Burundi Wetlands Governance and Management Profile

Authors
Nile Basin Initiative
Date Of Publication
10 Oct 2022
Accessibility status
Open Access
Language
English
Document Types
Technical Report
Type
Technical Report